Most popular on YouTube

Zeitgeist

This video 'Evolution of Dance' is the all time Most Viewed video on YouTube with 25,092,279 views at the time of writing this post. The next most viewed video had only half as many views — 12,584,122! If you see the two videos, the first is a 'performance-based-entertainment' piece, while the second is a 'spoofy-video' on the Pokemon theme song. But why such a huge difference in views?

The answer to that is what I shall indulgently christen the 'leader-feeder effect'. Which states that:

In a democratically evaluative framework, given two equally performing contenders, the one who takes the lead gets fed by a greater number of patrons (whose behaviour is in conformance with the zeitgeist), leading to an exponential difference between their performance metrics, thereafter.

In fact, if you see the views for the videos ranked after these, they tend to 'even-out'. So the videos ranked third, fourth, fifth and so on, do not have such a huge magnitude of difference between them. Now hypothetically, if YouTube were to remove these top two videos, the video currently ranked third, will see an exponential rise in the views it gets, and end up having a much bigger lead. Similarly, the next in line video will also see a rise in views under the diminishing leader-feeder effect.

Disclaimer: In case there is already some theory/postulate/model in economics that addresses this phenomenon — I haven't read it! And if you don't trust me, and would like to go along with 'that original research' — you just provided empirical evidence for my 'leader-feeder effect'. Q.E.D

Related (but hopelessly out-of-scale) trivia:
At last count, my video Brokeback Claymation on YouTube (which you can also see here) had 569.000 views (Oh yeah that's a decimal in between!)

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Most popular on YouTube

  1. totally agree. this could happen in the offline world too – if two equally talented associates join six months apart, the one that joined earlier has a bettre chance of staying ahead of the one that joined later. agree?

    Like

  2. Jammy:
    You may need to define “staying ahead” in terms of a ‘democratically evaluative framework’ before I agree :)

    Masood:
    Early adopters/adoption may or may not result in leadership…
    Yes, I am thinking of ‘playing around a little more :)

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s